"A woman must have money
and a room of her
own
if she has to write fiction."
I
normally do not read non-fiction, unless I feel compelled to. The last book of Woolf that I read was Orlando. I am eager to read To the Lighthouse as well. A Room of One's Own, was one of
the compelling ones, given that it is a long essay, penned like a fictional
piece of nonfiction. However, it was the thematic motif that gains precedence
over everything else: women’s writing.
The
book is a set of extended lectures that Virginia Woolf delivered to the
literary societies of Newnham and Girton colleges, Cambridge in October 1928.
As I turned the pages, I could not help wondering how much was added to the original
script, to turn it into the full-fledged book. I tried to picture Woolf on the dais, her notes before her, reading some these lines to the eager group of girls
before her. I could not imagine her reading some paragraphs though, because they
seem far too elaborate to be used fruitfully in a lecture.
The famous
catch-line appears on page one itself, though not highlighted or quoted
separately, it is the crux of the whole book. At the outset, it may seem like
an exaggerated claim. But Woolf does go on to emphasize, analyze and explain
her theory with great detailing.
While
it may seem like a far-fetched expectation or assumption, it does make sense
when we remember the time during which Woolf wrote. The position of women was
better than it was hundred years earlier, when Mary Wollstonecraft wrote her
books such as 'Vindication of the Rights of Woman', but was certainly not as relatively better as current times.
What
struck me at once, is the fact that a hundred years down the line some things
have not changed at all. Didn’t Rowling admit that she was forced to write in a cafe, because she found it more conducive to writing?
Another
striking factor is Woolf’s observation that women used male pseudonyms to
write. How far off is it today? One only has to look at Rowling again, and also
the highly successful erotic series penned by E.L.James, who was thought to be
a man for the longest possible time. Woolf did hit the nail on the head with
her analysis of the situation.
However,
one must admit that it is usually easy to identify the writing of a man which
is different from that of a woman. When she tackles the idea of values, we may
agree with Woolf when she points out that for a man, topics such as football,
sports etc. may be more important than shopping, which he may trivialize. So a
man may perceive a book on war as more important than an ‘insignificant’ one that
deals with a woman’s feelings. This could be the reason that some books that
women love may be boring to men, and vice versa.
While
pondering on her core statement, women do need money to sustain themselves. Few
writers are able to sustain a livelihood solely from writing. As for a room of
one’s own, privacy that allows minimum interruptions to thought flows and
emergence of ideas is a prerequisite for creativity.
However,
even the layman would notice that these criteria are hardly exclusive to women.
Men need the same luxuries to be successful writers. Having said that, we again
tend to agree with Woolf, when she points out that poets like Keats, for
instance, did face less hardship (in terms of being able to find a place to
write in peace) than the women of their time, despite their poverty.
‘The creative power of women differs greatly from that of men. Ought not education bring out and fortify the differences rather than the similarities?’ (79)
The gender inequality and its role in writing of women is exemplified convincingly by Woolf. In addition to earlier mentioned factors, women tend to be hesitant or reluctant to write what they actually want to write, thanks to censure that is patriarchal, and then some. The society at large does judge women a lot more.
The gender inequality and its role in writing of women is exemplified convincingly by Woolf. In addition to earlier mentioned factors, women tend to be hesitant or reluctant to write what they actually want to write, thanks to censure that is patriarchal, and then some. The society at large does judge women a lot more.
The
fictional aspects used in the book are enticing in their essence. The creation
of a sister for Shakespeare to drive home her points is a masterstroke. Judith,
the imaginary sister’s story is heartrending, more importantly it is completely
convincing. The scenarios gain more credibility when compared and contrasted
with the life of Shakespeare, as described rather accurately by Woolf. The
scenario is a timeless one, because one can imagine a similar series of events
occurring to any woman in today’s time too.
To
conclude, Woolf has touched upon core ideas that are crucial to writing,
irrespective of one’s gender, namely financial security and privacy that ensures minimal interruptions.
Additional aspects such as gender inequality and women’s literature put forth
some important perspectives. Overall, the book offers ample scope for more
thought and discussion.
Did
you find my review useful? Do let me know in the comments.
Happy
Reading. Stay safe, readers.
No comments:
Post a Comment